In classical conditioning how are the neutral stimulus and the conditioned stimulus related

Unconditioned, neutral, and conditioned stimuli as well as unconditioned and conditioned responses in Ivan Pavlov's research on digestion.

A neutral stimulus is a stimulus which initially produces no specific response other than focusing attention. In classical conditioning, when used together with an unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus. With repeated presentations of both the neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus will elicit a response as well, known as a conditioned response. Once the neutral stimulus elicits a conditioned response, the neutral stimulus becomes known as a conditioned stimulus. The conditioned response is the same as the unconditioned response, but occurs in the presence of the conditioned stimulus rather than the unconditioned stimulus.[1]

Pavlov's research in digestion[edit]

Ivan Pavlov conducted multiple experiments investigating digestion in dogs in which neutral, unconditioned, and conditioned stimuli were used. In these experiments, the neutral stimulus was the sound of a bell ringing. This sound was presented to the dogs along with food, which acted as an unconditioned stimulus. The presentation of a neutral stimulus does not result in any particular response, but the presentation of an unconditioned stimulus results in an unconditioned response, which was the dogs salivating in Pavlov's experiments. After conditioning, the bell ringing became a conditioned stimulus.[2] Pavlov later used the sound of a metronome as a neutral stimulus in studies on cerebral cortex activity.[3]

See also[edit]

  • Behavior modification

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Pavlovian (Classical) Conditioning". Indiana University.
  2. ^ Pavlov, Ivan (1902). The Work of the Digestive Glands. London: Charles Griffin & Company, Limited.
  3. ^ Pavlov, Ivan (1927). "Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex". Classics in the History of Psychology.

Unconditioned stimulus in classical conditioning | Examples | Unconditioned stimulus vs neutral stimulus | Unconditioned stimulus vs conditioned stimulus | Little Albert experiment

What is an unconditioned stimulus

In classical conditioning, an unconditioned stimulus (US or UCS) is defined as any stimulus that can naturally and automatically trigger a response without prior learning or practice. It is also called the primary reinforcer. The involuntary response is a reflex triggered whenever the UCS is present.

Russian physiologist, Ivan Pavlov, first discovered classical conditioning when he was feeding his dogs. The dogs would smell the food and automatically salivate. This natural response did not require any prior learning. So the food’s smell was the UCS​1​. This phenomenon is also called the Pavlovian conditioning.

So, how to find unconditioned stimuli?

A UCS can trigger a response naturally. This response is a biological reaction. A person or animal usually does not have control over this behavior​2​.

Unconditioned stimulus examples

Here are some examples of the unconditioned stimulus.

  1. Touching a hot iron
    Touching a hot iron makes you withdraw your hand right away.
    The hot iron is the UCS.
  2. Eating
    Putting food into your mouth causes your mouth to water.
    The food is the UCS.
  3. Hurting your foot
    Dropping a rock on your foot makes you scream in pain.
    The rock is the UCS.
  4. Inhaling dust
    Dust entering your nose causes you to sneeze.
    Dust is the UCS.

The Difference Between Unconditioned Stimulus and Neutral Stimulus

An unconditional stimulus elicits a natural, reflexive response, called the unconditioned response (UCR).

A stimulus that doesn’t naturally elicit a response is a neutral response. For example, food is a UCS for dogs and can cause salivation. But ringing a bell by itself doesn’t trigger the same response. The bell’s sound is hence a neutral stimulus.

The difference between Unconditioned Stimulus and Conditioned Stimulus

A neutral stimulus initially doesn’t trigger any particular response. However, when a neutral stimulus is presented together with a UCS, an association can form.

Classical conditioning happens when a neutral stimulus is paired with an UCS repeatedly to create associative learning. The previously neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) and can trigger the same response as the UCS.

So initially, the neutral stimulus does not affect a specific behavior. But after repeatedly presented together with the UCS, it becomes a CS, and the person or animal subconsciously learns to react with the same response when it’s present. This response is then called a conditioned response (CR) or learned response.

For example, in Pavlov’s experiments, he sounded a bell whenever he brought food to his dogs. After multiple repetitions, the dogs learned to expect food and naturally salivated when they heard the bell’s sound even when they did not see the food. When UCS (food) was paired with a previously neutral stimulus (the sound of a bell), the neutral stimulus became a CS.

Little Albert Experiment

Another example of using an unconditioned stimulus to condition a subject is the infamous “Little Albert Experiment.”​3​ 

In this experiment, psychologist John B. Watson exposed the infant to a white rat. When the infant attempted to touch the rat, he would make a loud noise to scare him. Several repetitions later, the child cried upon seeing the rat alone.

In this case, the loud noise was an unconditioned stimulus. The rat served as a neutral stimulus, and the child’s cries were unconditioned reflexes.

Psychologists suggest that this type of fear conditioning by an unconditioned aversive stimulus is responsible for psychological disorders such as anxiety disorder and PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder)​4​.

References

  1. 1.

    Kimmel HD. Inhibition of the unconditioned response in classical conditioning. Psychological Review. Published online 1966:232-240. doi:10.1037/h0023270

  2. 2.

    Clark RE. Classical Conditioning and Brain Systems: The Role of Awareness. Science. Published online April 3, 1998:77-81. doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.77

  3. 3.

    Harris B. Whatever happened to little Albert? American Psychologist. Published online 1979:151-160. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.2.151

  4. 4.

    Maren S. Neurobiology of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning. Annu Rev Neurosci. Published online March 2001:897-931. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.897

How are the neutral stimulus and the conditioned stimulus related quizlet?

In classical conditioning, a neutral stimulus is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US), which causes an unconditioned response (UR). The neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) and causes a conditioned response (CR).

Are neutral stimulus and the conditioned response related?

A neutral stimulus can become a conditioned stimulus (CSz) by being paired with an existing conditioned stimulus (CSl). In classical conditioning, occurs when a novel stimulus that resembles the conditioned stimulus, elicits the conditioned response in the absence of any conditioning trials with the novel stimulus.

Why are the neutral stimulus and the conditioned stimulus always the same?

The Neutral Stimulus A neutral stimulus doesn't trigger any particular response at first, but when used together with an unconditioned stimulus, it can effectively stimulate learning, eventually becoming a conditioned stimulus. A good example of a neutral stimulus is a sound or a song.

What is the relationship between the conditioned stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus between the conditioned response and the unconditioned response?

The key difference between conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus is that conditioned stimulus produces a learned response to the previously neutral stimulus while unconditioned stimulus produces a response without any previous learning.

zusammenhängende Posts

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte