Practice Question – Elucidate the basic premises of Davis’ structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society? [UPSC 2016] Show Approach – Introduction, Explain Davis-Moore theory of social stratification, Apply it to the Indian context, Give examples, Criticism, Conclusion INTRODUCTION Social stratification refers to unequal relations between individual and groups in a society. All the members of the society are a part of this arrangement of unequal social relations. Those who have occupied lower position in this order of relations have often resented their underprivileged status, whereas those who have enjoyed a privileged status have been averse to concede any change in the existing system. Social structures are not constant. They change and reconstitute themselves. They undergo transformation with the activity of their members. They are subject to changes through scores of ways but more specifically through political action. In India, scholars have pointed out how the electoral process has led to the reformulation and reassertion of caste identities. Social agents or actors (members of a society) may understand their position and role in social structures differently. FUNTIONAL APPROACH TO STRATIFICATION Functionalist tendency The most important representatives of this trend are Emile Durkheim, A.R. Radcliffe Brown and Talcott Parsons. They see social structures as external to individual actors. These structures vary from one society to the other and largely explain the similarity and differences between one society and another. The behaviour of individuals in social life is to Basic concepts
The necessity of stratification Every society requires individuals who can be placed and motivated for specific tasks. There are social positions and
duties attached to them. Individual members in a society are assigned work in a specific position based on their eligibility and ability. People are motivated at two levels: This is true of all systems, whether they are relatively static or somewhat dynamic. This goes on as a process. This is prevalent in both competitive and non-competitive system. Motivation may vary depending upon the nature of the system. The logic of stratification Since positions are not the same, therefore some positions require special training, and some are functionally more important than the others. Duties attached to given positions must be performed with the diligence required for those. On the basis of such a functionalist logic, a society thus has some kinds of rewards as inducements and these rewards are distributed based on one’s social position. Therefore, a social order is created which constitutes of rewards and distribution pattern followed by the foundation of the stratification system in the society. Social inequality also emerges at this stage. Social inequality is thus unconsciously evolved, which is clear from the above explanation that the most qualified persons occupy the highest position in the social ladder. In every society, whether it is complex or simple, every individual is differentiated on the basis of her/his self-esteem and prestige. So, a society is characterised by inequality and the intensity and type of such inequality vary from society to society. DAVIS MOORE’S THESIS
Thus, social stratification is a consequence of inevitability of differentiation of roles and approaches to Social Stratification duties. Further, different duties and roles carry differential power and prestige. And the differentiation of roles and duties is inevitable for the survival of human society. Hence, stratification becomes inevitable in social life. CRITICISM Melvin M. Tumin. argued that it was impossible to calculate the functional importance of any position in society objectively. According to Tumin, in his essay “Some Principles of Stratification: A Critical Analysis” published in 1953, “to judge that
engineers in a factory are functionally more important to the factory than the unskilled workmen involves a notion Ralf Dahrendorf considers that the control of social behaviour based on positive and negative sanctions creates a rank order of distributive status. Conformity is rewarded,
deviance is penalised. Thus, stratification lies in certain features of all human societies which are necessary for them. The authority structure of the society sustains its system of norms and What are the criticisms of the functionalist approach in explaining social stratification?It does not sufficiently explain the differences in income among all professions. It relies too much on inequalities like race and gender to explain social stratification. It views social stratification too negatively and doesn't account for its benefits. It does not incorporate an analysis of global stratification.
What are the criticisms of the functionalist perspective?Functionalism has been criticized for its failure to account for social change and individual agency; some consider it conservatively biased. Functionalism has been criticized for attributing human-like needs to society. Emile Durkheim 's work is considered the foundation of functionalist theory in sociology.
What is a major criticism of structural functionalism?In the 1960s, functionalism was criticized for being unable to account for social change, or for structural contradictions and conflict (and thus was often called "consensus theory"). Also, it ignores inequalities including race, gender, class, which cause tension and conflict.
What are the disadvantages of functionalism?Weaknesses. It fails to consider individual differences within society – not all societies look or act alike.. It assumes that everything in society is largely positive – what about people who are not working towards the common good? ... . Finally, functionalism can be criticised for having a deterministic view.. |