When transferring a patient from bed to chair using a mechanical lift the nurse should

A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed

A Garg et al. Ergonomics. 1991 Mar.

Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted in an effort to reduce back stress for nursing personnel while performing the patient handling tasks of transferring the patient from bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed. These patient handling tasks were studied using five manual techniques and three hoist-assisted techniques. The manual techniques involved one-person and two-person transfers. One manual technique involved a two-person lift of the patient under the arms; the others used a rocking and pulling action and included the use of assistive devices (a gait belt using a two-person transfer, a walking belt with handles using a one-person and a two-person transfer, and a patient handling sling with cutout areas to allow for a hand grip (Medesign) for a one-person transfer). The three mechanical hoists were Hoyer, Trans-Aid and Ambulift. Six female nursing students with prior patient transfer experience served both as nurses and as passive patients. Static biomechanical evaluation showed that pulling techniques, as compared to lifting the patient, required significantly lower hand forces and produced significantly lower erector spinae and compressive forces at the L5/S1 disc (P greater than or equal to 0.01). Shear force, trunk moments and the percentage of females who were capable of performing the transfers (based on static strength simulation) also favoured pulling methods. Perceived stress ratings for the shoulder, upper back, lower back and whole body were lower for pulling methods than those for lifting the patient (P less than or equal to 0.01). Patients found the pulling techniques, with the exception of when using the gait belt, felt more comfortable and more secure than the lifting method (P less than or equal to 0.01). However, a number of subjects believed that the patient handling sling (Medesign) and the walking belt with one person making the transfer would not work for those patients who could not bear weight and those who were heavy, contracted or combative. A walking belt with two persons was the preferred manual method. Two out of three hoists (Hoyer lift and Trans-Aid) were perceived by the nurses to be as physically stressful as manual methods. Patients found these two hoists to be more uncomfortable and felt less secure than with three of the five manual methods (one- and two-person walking belts and Medesign). Ambulift was found to be the least stressful, the most comfortable, and the most secure among all eight methods. Pulling techniques and hoists took significantly longer amounts of time to make the transfer than manually lifting the patient (P less than or equal to 0.01). The two-person walking belt using a pulling technique and Ambulift are recommended for transferring patients from bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed. A large-scale field study is needed to verify these recommendations.

Similar articles

  • A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: wheelchair to shower chair and shower chair to wheelchair.

    Garg A, Owen B, Beller D, Banaag J. Garg A, et al. Ergonomics. 1991 Apr;34(4):407-19. doi: 10.1080/00140139108967325. Ergonomics. 1991. PMID: 1860461

  • Reducing back stress to nursing personnel: an ergonomic intervention in a nursing home.

    Garg A, Owen B. Garg A, et al. Ergonomics. 1992 Nov;35(11):1353-75. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967398. Ergonomics. 1992. PMID: 1425566

  • An ergonomic evaluation of nursing assistants' job in a nursing home.

    Garg A, Owen BD, Carlson B. Garg A, et al. Ergonomics. 1992 Sep;35(9):979-95. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967377. Ergonomics. 1992. PMID: 1387079

  • Prevention of disabling back injuries in nurses by the use of mechanical patient lift systems.

    Edlich RF, Winters KL, Hudson MA, Britt LD, Long WB. Edlich RF, et al. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14(6):521-33. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v14.i6.70. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004. PMID: 15698378 Review.

  • Manual materials handling and the biomechanical basis for prevention of low-back pain in industry--an overview.

    Chaffin DB. Chaffin DB. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Dec;48(12):989-96. doi: 10.1080/15298668791385967. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987. PMID: 2963515 Review.

Cited by

  • Manual Handling in Aged Care: Impact of Environment-related Interventions on Mobility.

    Coman RL, Caponecchia C, McIntosh AS. Coman RL, et al. Saf Health Work. 2018 Dec;9(4):372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6. Saf Health Work. 2018. PMID: 30559984 Free PMC article. Review.

  • Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.

    Requejo PS, Furumasu J, Mulroy SJ. Requejo PS, et al. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2015 Jan-Mar;31(1):26-41. doi: 10.1097/TGR.0000000000000042. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 26366040 Free PMC article.

  • Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.

    Garg A, Hegmann KT, Moore JS, Kapellusch J, Thiese MS, Boda S, Bhoyr P, Bloswick D, Merryweather A, Sesek R, Deckow-Schaefer G, Foster J, Wood E, Sheng X, Holubkov R; BackWorks Study Team. Garg A, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 7;14:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-84. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. PMID: 23497211 Free PMC article.

  • Individual and organisational determinants of use of ergonomic devices in healthcare.

    Koppelaar E, Knibbe JJ, Miedema HS, Burdorf A. Koppelaar E, et al. Occup Environ Med. 2011 Sep;68(9):659-65. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.055939. Epub 2010 Nov 23. Occup Environ Med. 2011. PMID: 21098827 Free PMC article.

  • Intensive education combined with low tech ergonomic intervention does not prevent low back pain in nurses.

    Hartvigsen J, Lauritzen S, Lings S, Lauritzen T. Hartvigsen J, et al. Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jan;62(1):13-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.010843. Occup Environ Med. 2005. PMID: 15613603 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  • Full Text Sources

    • Taylor & Francis
  • Medical

    • MedlinePlus Health Information

Which action should the nurse take to move the patient up in bed with a mechanical lift?

Lock the base lever in the open position when moving the mechanical lift..
Raise the mechanical lift so that the patient is six inches off the mattress..
Keep the wheels of the mechanical lift locked throughout the procedure..
Ensure the patients feet are guarded when sitting on the mechanical lift..

When preparing to transfer a patient from the bed to a chair the nurse should?

When preparing to safely transfer a patient from a bed to a wheelchair, the nurse should first:.
Determine the patient's arm strength..
Assess the patient's weight-bearing ability..
Assess the patient's willingness to cooperate..
Decide upon the most appropriate transfer method..

When transferring a patient from a bed to a chair the nurse should use which of the following to avoid back injury?

Hold a strong abdominal contraction. Position your body close to your loved one to decrease strain on your back. Before movement, contract your abdominal muscles to protect your back. Use your knees and your lower body during transfer to decrease strain on your back.

When assisting a patient from bed to wheelchair you should?

Transfer—Bed to Wheelchair.
1 Sit the patient up: Lock the wheelchair. Help the patient turn over onto his or her side, facing you. ... .
2 Stand the patient up: Have the patient scoot to the edge of the bed. ... .
3 Sit the patient down: Have the patient pivot toward the chair, as you continue to hold on..