Which of the following is not a required attribute of a good strategic alliance partner

Which of the following is not a required attribute of a good strategic alliance partner

  • Which of the following is not a required attribute of a good strategic alliance partner
    Access through your institution

Which of the following is not a required attribute of a good strategic alliance partner

Which of the following is not a required attribute of a good strategic alliance partner

Firms increasingly form alliances to access needed capabilities, gain knowledge and seek competitive advantage. Strategic alliance partner selection is a critical aspect of successful alliance development; even superior alliance management may not be sufficient to overcome poor initial partner screening and selection efforts. Prior partner selection research has typically focused on generic, conceptual motivations for alliances, addressing only some pieces of the partner selection puzzle; in addition, previous research has been static and has not presented a way to operationalize partner selection analysis. This paper presents a new conceptual comprehensive partner selection framework that includes dynamic partner selection considerations. In addition, a new analytical partner selection tool is presented to illustrate how firms can operationalize their partner selection analysis process. Developed and tested with input from over two hundred alliance managers, the comprehensive partner selection framework includes new perspectives and an analysis of four critical alliance partner selection criteria, or critical success factors (CSFs): task-related CSFs — factors that facilitate or inhibit the successful completion of desired alliance objectives; learning-related CSFs — critical, desired attributes in potential alliance partners that enhance learning outcomes; partnering-related CSFs — relational factors that can enhance or inhibit how the alliance unfolds and therefore affect its outcomes; and risk-related CSFs — factors that arise from the interdependent nature of alliances, which are often neglected in practice. Where aspects of these CSFs have been omitted from analysis during initial partner selection, alliance managers tell us of a litany of issues, challenges and failures that they have been forced to address, many of which might have been avoided altogether with greater diligence up front. We embed these four sets of criteria within a comprehensive partner selection framework and provide guidelines, examples and a specific methodology designed to help managers address the complexities involved in developing their own, unique partner selection criteria and processes.

Cited by (0)

Jeffrey L. Cummings, Associate Professor, Sellinger School of Business, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. His research and consulting focuses on strategic alliances, strategy formulation approaches and knowledge-transfer mechanisms. His work has been applied at IBM, the World Bank and the U.S. Navy, among other organizations, and has appeared in Long Range Planning, California Management Review, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management and other outlets. E-mail: [email protected].

Stevan R. Holmberg, Professor, Kogod School of Business, American University, District of Columbia, USA. His research interests focus on strategic alliances, green and clean-tech entrepreneurship in the U.S. and Sweden, strategic management and U.S. and E.U. franchise business failure. He has published in the Journal of Business Venturing, Long Range Planning and other entrepreneurship and management journals and has presented papers in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Sweden and the U.S. He is Management Department Chair and former Acting Dean of the Kogod School of Business. E-mail: [email protected].

View full text

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Conclusion

The past 18 months have been unprecedented in many ways. It is therefore not surprising that company leaders are looking for solutions to help them stay ahead of the curve, and for many strategic alliances are on top of the agenda.

Indeed, strategic alliances offer characteristics that make them an attractive option in today’s world. For companies operating in an industry undergoing rapid digitisation, like the financial services industry, strategic alliances can offer a fast and sometimes less risky access to assets and intellectual property compared to ‘build’ or ‘buy’ strategies. In financial services, two specific use cases for strategic alliances are co-investing with existing suppliers in new / improved technology solutions, or forming a strategic alliance with other industry players to build a marketplace or ecosystem of service offerings.

Importantly, Corporate Strategy and M&A departments that have a track record of successful alliances, use this as a convincing argument to win over new potential alliance partners.

But harvesting value from alliances is no simple task. When entering into an alliance, partners need to be aware that delivering the ambition and achieving the benefits does not happen on auto-pilot.

At Deloitte, we have identified five factors that companies should consider when entering an alliance:

  1. Prioritise collaboration on matters that drive value for both partners
  2. Clearly define the responsibilities of all partners and put the right people in charge
  3. Ensure the alliance connects with and contributes to the ‘business as usual’
  4. Design the governance as much for effectiveness as for adaptability
  5. Invest time to define a roadmap, performance metrics and rigorous tracking mechanisms

While strategic alliances are not the ‘silver bullet’ for all the strategic challenges companies are facing in today’s world, they offer specific opportunities in certain circumstances. Strategic alliances have therefore an important place in the toolbox of each Corporate Strategy and M&A department.

What are the characteristics of a good partner in a strategic alliance?

What makes a good strategic alliance partner?.
They have a similar audience. ... .
They are not your competitors. ... .
They can give you access to new customers and prospects. ... .
They want to work with you. ... .
They want something you can offer..

Which of the following is not strategic alliance?

Joint Venture is not an example of a strategic alliance. In a strategic alliance, the two companies remain separate entities. In a joint venture, a new entity is formed.

What are the 5 components of a strategic relationship?

Examining each of the five strategic criteria in depth provides insight into how the strategic value of alliances can be leveraged..
Critical to a business objective. ... .
Competitive advantage and core competency. ... .
Blocking a competitive threat. ... .
Future strategic options. ... .
Risk mitigation..

Which of the following is not considered a strategic alliance success factor?

Which of the following is NOT considered a strategic alliance success factor? Operate with short-term time horizon.