Neo-malthusian theory can be used to explain which of the following situations?

1 Neo-Malthusian Theory

  1. Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population as it Affects the Future Improvement of Societies, with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorat, and other writers, 1798 edition (reprints of Economic Classics, N.Y., 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population or a View of its Past and Present Effects on Human Happiness with an Inquiry into our Prospects Respecting the Future Removal or Mitigation of the Evil which it Occasions, 1801 edition (Richard D. Irwing, Homewood, Illinois, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb (Ballantine, N.Y., 1968);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anne H. Ehrlich, Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology, 2nd Edition (W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis Pirages, ARK II: Social Response to Environmental Imperatives (W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garrett Hardin, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, in Science, Vol. 162, Dec. 1968, pp. 1243–8;

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Georg Borgstrom, The Hungry Planet (Collier-Macmillan Ltd., London, 1965);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Antony J. Dolman (ed.), RIO, Reshaping the International Order (The New American Library, Inc., N.Y., 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ervin Laszlo et al., Goals for Mankind (E.P. Dutton, N.Y., 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  10. James W. Botkin et al., No Limits to Learning (Pergamon Press, N.Y., 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thierry de Montbrial, Energy: The Countdown (Pergamon Press, N.Y., 1979);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orio Giarini, Dialogue on Wealth and Welfare (Pergamon Press, N.Y., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jürgen Habermas, ‘Between Philosophy and Science: Marxism as Critique’, in Theory and Practice (Heinemann, London, 1974), pp. 195–252;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Albrecht Wellmer, Critical Theory of Society (The Seabury Press, N.Y., 1974);

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roberto Miguelez, Science, Valeurs et Rationalité (Editions de l’Université d’Ottawa, Ottawa, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Donella Meadows et al., The Limits to Growth (The New American Library Inc., N.Y., 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. The model is that of J.W. Forrester posed in Industrial Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  18. This study is based on World demographic estimates for the last 3 centuries, for example, drawn from A.M. Curr-Saunders, World Population: Past Growth and Present Trends (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1936);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Donald Bogue, Principles of Demography (John Wiley and Sons, N.Y., 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  20. William Ophuls, Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity: Prologue to a Political Theory of the Steady State (W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, in particular, C.B. Macpherson, The Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garrett Hardin, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, in Science, Vol. 162, Dec. 1968, pp. 1243–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Fletcher, Situation Ethics (Westminster, Philadelphia, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See, for example, Paul Q. Hirst, ‘Economic Classes and Politics’ in A. Hunt (ed.), Class and Class Structure (Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nicos Poulantzas, Political Power and Social Classes (New Left Books, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kenneth Boulding, ‘The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth’ in Toward a Steady-State Economy, Herman Daly (ed.), (W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1973), pp. 121–32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ratko Milisavljevic, Environment, idéologie et science (Editions anthropos, Paris, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lester Brown, World without Borders (Random House, 1972), p. 351.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harold and Margaret Sprout, Towards a Politics of the Planet Earth (Nostrand Rinehold Co., N.Y., 1971), p. 476.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aurelio Peccei, One Hundred Pages for the Future, Reflections of the President of the Club of Rome (Pergamon Press, N.Y., 1981), pp. 110–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

journal article

World Food Trends: A Neo-Malthusian Prospect?

Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society

Vol. 145, No. 4 (Dec., 2001)

, pp. 438-455 (18 pages)

Published By: American Philosophical Society

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1558183

This is a preview. Log in to get access

Journal Information

The Proceedings journal contains papers that have been read before the members of the American Philosophical Society at meetings held in April and November. The papers sometimes are given as part of a topical symposium. In addition, articles that have been submitted by outside authors, reviewed by qualified scholars in the particular fields of study, and accepted for publication by the Committee on Publications, are published. Proceedings articles generally are 30 pages in length or less, although exceptions are made. The Proceedings journal also contains biographical memoirs of deceased members of the Society.

Publisher Information

An eminent scholarly organization of international reputation, the American Philosophical Society promotes useful knowledge in the sciences and humanities through excellence in scholarly research, professional meetings, publications, library resources, and community outreach.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society © 2001 American Philosophical Society
Request Permissions

What is an example of Neo Malthusian?

Prominent neo-Malthusians such as Paul Ehrlich maintain that ultimately, population growth on Earth is still too high, and will eventually lead to a serious crisis. The 2007–2008 world food price crisis inspired further Malthusian arguments regarding the prospects for global food supply.

What is the main argument of the Neo Malthusians?

At the basis of the neo-Malthusian argument, is a fundamentally logical idea that more people, at a given level of per capita consumption, means more pressure on land, food, energy, and a wide variety of other environmental resources (Rio Summit, 1992).

What is Neo Malthusian quizlet?

Neo Malthusian Theory. believe that the world's population has been growing to fast implying that the world would be better off if it had fewer people. like the predecessor the Neo Malthusians believe poverty and rapid population growth on the world's poorest population.

Which of the following most accurately describes a neo Malthusian attitude?

Neo-Malthusianism refers to the belief that population control through the use of contraception is essential for the survival of the earth's human population.